Quality control across every language in the release.
Multilingual QC reviews a localized release as a set rather than as separate language versions, checking linguistic accuracy, technical compliance and consistency between versions before anything reaches a platform.

Twelve correct versions, one failed release.
Most QC happens inside one language, and each reviewer signs off correctly. Nobody checks whether the versions agree: a name transliterated three ways, an episode title translated inconsistently, subtitles timed to shot changes in six languages and to dialogue in six, one loudness value the platform will reject. The release fails at the platform, publicly, after your delivery date.
The review.
- 01LinguisticAccuracy, glossary terms, register, pronunciation, dialect and naturalness.
- 02TechnicalLoudness, sync, artifacts, subtitle timing and limits, naming, packaging, metadata.
- 03Cross-versionConsistent names, terms, subtitle conventions and loudness; complete deliverable sets.
What we check.
- Translation accuracy
- Terminology against the glossary
- Loudness compliance
- Subtitle timing
- Names consistent across languages
- Complete deliverable sets
Two situations.
Inside our workflow
The five checks are built in and included, not commissioned separately.
Independent review
Of work by others, before a demanding platform, after a rejection, across split vendors, or before a large catalog push.
Our reports are direct. Sound work is called sound. Problems are named, located and graded by severity.
What you get.
A report per language plus a consolidated cross-version summary. Issues are graded blocking, major or minor, with timecodes, so your vendor can act without a second round of investigation.
Frequently
Asked Questions.
What is multilingual quality control?
Can you QC work another vendor produced?
Is QC included if you handle the whole project?
How are issues reported?
Ready to bring your story to life?
Let's make your story sound amazing, everywhere.

